Carbone Industrie brakes fitted to Charles' car
I think I have to correct you with this notion that people have the the electrical "mystery box" is accounting for power differences. This is not so and is far from the truth... But it may be lost on persons just joining the sport.CRazyLemon wrote: ↑10 Jun 2026, 09:37What you see on track isn't just ICE alone, otherwise if the tests are to believed you'd see RBPT outperforming the Mercedes on the straights as well.gearboxtrouble wrote: ↑10 Jun 2026, 01:29That just not possible. We're talking ~50hp assuming 575-600 for the RBPT. I don't think it is realistic that Ferrari would be that far behind. Based on the (limited) wheel to wheel action we've seen between a RBPT engined car and a Ferrari engined car the RBPT car does seem faster down the straights but its not that level of gap. Either the FIA has messed up the test in a way thats overrating the RBPT engine or RBPT are running it below its potential for reliability reasons.
If you are delivering more ICE power it means you can harvest more if you so choose, that would make any pure ICE grunt advantage look like less of a difference.
Anyway Mercedes getting ADUO means RBPT must be extremely inefficient on the electrical side that they're getting trounced engine wise by Mercedes.
Charles is playing with fire here... Not sure he's the experimenting type of driver to do this..