pipex wrote:Fauzy in the Lotus has been running without power steering... not optimal.
Fauzy has been running in the Lotus, not optimal.

pipex wrote:Fauzy in the Lotus has been running without power steering... not optimal.
He's also got 52 laps under his belt. I'm worried about Virgin, only 4 laps so far today ????pipex wrote:Fauzy in the Lotus has been running without power steering... not optimal.
Giblet wrote:Fauzy has been running in the Lotus, not optimal.
+ 1richard_leeds wrote:He's also got 52 laps under his belt. I'm worried about Virgin, only 4 laps so far today ????pipex wrote:Fauzy in the Lotus has been running without power steering... not optimal.
Its not only the fuel its also the tires...You cant have the same tire performance in a 5 lap stint and on an 20+ lap stint...Think about it.godlameroso wrote:Just because a driver posts a time during a 5 lap stint does not mean he was not fueled to go longer
Actually Massa's 5 lap stint was straight after a longer 20ish lap stint and unlikely to have refuelled. He stopped on the track, possibly run dry?Poleman wrote:Its not only the fuel its also the tires...You cant have the same tire performance in a 5 lap stint and on an 20+ lap stint...Think about it.godlameroso wrote:Just because a driver posts a time during a 5 lap stint does not mean he was not fueled to go longer
Is that him getting towed back to the pits after his stop on the track?gibells wrote:![]()
Whatever this is,its happenning quite often...Not only for massa but for Barrichello too...So maybe they are going dry...Many cars are left over on track this year isnt it?richard_leeds wrote:Actually Massa's 5 lap stint was straight after a longer 20ish lap stint and unlikely to have refuelled. He stopped on the track, possibly run dry?Poleman wrote:Its not only the fuel its also the tires...You cant have the same tire performance in a 5 lap stint and on an 20+ lap stint...Think about it.godlameroso wrote:Just because a driver posts a time during a 5 lap stint does not mean he was not fueled to go longer
There was haphazard a weather pattern. And the best times are scattered over different parts of the day.Overcast High Temp: 15°C / 59°F
Track: Damp
Note the leaderboard shows faster times from earlier in the day on a dry track.http://live.autosport.com/commentary.php/id/178 wrote:Hamilton 1:23.017.
Vettel, Massa lapping in the 1:24s
1:24.6 for Schumacher and de la Rosa
Sutil 1:24.281
1:25.8 for Massa
What it doesn't show is what programs they were running near the end.richard_leeds wrote:OK, as far as I can make out, that session ended in the glory laps shown below with quotes from the commentary.
Note the leaderboard shows faster times from earlier in the day on a dry track.http://live.autosport.com/commentary.php/id/178 wrote:Hamilton 1:23.017.
Vettel, Massa lapping in the 1:24s
1:24.6 for Schumacher and de la Rosa
Sutil 1:24.281
1:25.8 for Massa
I was using the traditional presumption that the short runs at the end of practice are glory laps on near empty tanks. Most seemed to be on short stints of 5 or fewer laps.Tazio wrote:What it doesn't show is what programs they were running near the end.
richard_leeds wrote:I was using the traditional presumption that the short runs at the end of practice are glory laps on near empty tanks. Most seemed to be on short stints of 5 or fewer laps.Tazio wrote:What it doesn't show is what programs they were running near the end.
Normally these are the fastest times on the leaderboard. However the wet track means there were quicker times earlier in the day on the dry track, even though they were longer runs (with more fuel). Hence the reason I've had to take times from the commentary.
Haven't you got a long bike ride now? You seem to have been here all night, you must be shattered!
Edit - For example, earlier in the day Vettel set a 1:23.440 on lap 12 of a 24 lap run. The short glory run in the wet at the end could only manage 1:24ish. Of course this assumes he was on a glory run at the end