Same question.
Malboro give huge amounts of money to Ferrari, if it is not to promote their tobacco products WTF is it for?
Haven't anyone noticed the change in the red-tone on the Ferrari cars from the 70s to now, come on now?autogyro wrote:Same question.
Malboro give huge amounts of money to Ferrari, if it is not to promote their tobacco products WTF is it for?
but then sells the right to put ads on the cars to third parties, probably making money in the process. It's businessautogyro wrote:Same question.
Malboro give huge amounts of money to Ferrari, if it is not to promote their tobacco products WTF is it for?
Because beurocracy is per definition slow, unless you've noticed. Just look at the damn cars , they have xactly the Marlboro colorscheme.vall wrote:but then sells the right to put ads on the cars to third parties, probably making money in the process. It's businessautogyro wrote:Same question.
Malboro give huge amounts of money to Ferrari, if it is not to promote their tobacco products WTF is it for?![]()
What I do not understand is how come EU started looking into this now? The Ferrari-Marlboro deal was no secret. Even the team's official name is "Marlboro-Ferrari"?
Does not mean anything! Ferrari's color has been red since how long? 60 years? Any lower can scrap this argument in court. Unless they prove that the bar-code like is indirect ad, they go nothing. As a matter of fact, it was just a comment of a (probably bored) doctor and I am not aware if there is any official word from EU.....xpensive wrote:Because beurocracy is per definition slow, unless you've noticed. Just look at the damn cars , they have xactly the Marlboro colorscheme.vall wrote:but then sells the right to put ads on the cars to third parties, probably making money in the process. It's businessautogyro wrote:Same question.
Malboro give huge amounts of money to Ferrari, if it is not to promote their tobacco products WTF is it for?![]()
What I do not understand is how come EU started looking into this now? The Ferrari-Marlboro deal was no secret. Even the team's official name is "Marlboro-Ferrari"?
And?autogyro wrote:Believe me the issue will not be allowed to drop.
Ferrari receive money from tobacco profits, nothing else matters not even any advertising.
They're not actually sponsored, they're a technical partnership, neither receive any money off of each other only information about composites, aero etc.andrew wrote:And?autogyro wrote:Believe me the issue will not be allowed to drop.
Ferrari receive money from tobacco profits, nothing else matters not even any advertising.
McLaren are sponsored by BAE Systems. Some of their products are pretty deadly.
McLaren have stated that the silver paint job is to do with a sponsor who they don't want to name. I can only think that it is West. There is a link to a report about this on one of the earlier pages on this thread.autogyro wrote:and? nothing
Tobacco money for sport is illegal, BAE Systems products are not.
Mind you West is a tobacco company and the McLaren cars look very similar in colour.
Do West give Maca any money?
Do McLaren not carry BAE's name on the cars anymore? They certainly used to not so long ago.Confused_Andy wrote:They're not actually sponsored, they're a technical partnership, neither receive any money off of each other only information about composites, aero etc.andrew wrote:And?autogyro wrote:Believe me the issue will not be allowed to drop.
Ferrari receive money from tobacco profits, nothing else matters not even any advertising.
McLaren are sponsored by BAE Systems. Some of their products are pretty deadly.
Thats the difference, Ferrari receive money from Marlborough for advertising their product "the barcode" its blatantly obvious...
strictly speaking, it is not illegal unless this leads to direct or indirect advertisement of tobacco product (not arguing whether it is moral to receive the money or not). I guess this will be quite herd to prove, the colorscheme, the "bar" code,. that's a BS argumentautogyro wrote:and? nothing
Tobacco money for sport is illegal
+1vall wrote:strictly speaking, it is not illegal unless this leads to direct or indirect advertisement of tobacco product (not arguing whether it is moral to receive the money or not). I guess this will be quite herd to prove, the colorscheme, the "bar" code,. that's a BS argumentautogyro wrote:and? nothing
Tobacco money for sport is illegal