Mercedes AMG F1 W03

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Here is what Scarbs had to say about it earlier this month.

Dragonfly
Dragonfly
23
Joined: 17 Mar 2008, 21:48
Location: Bulgaria

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Fredy4 wrote:The more I look at that picture...

Are they even pipes or a flat surface witht the weave giving a 3D impression?

Look at it again, but with the fact its flat in your head.
Exactly. Look at it taking taking into account the whole arrangement of parts and components there.
It's the weave which gives the impression of (ribbed) pipes while the actual surface is concave.
F1PitRadio ‏@F1PitRadio : MSC, "Sorry guys, there's not more in it"
Spa 2012

User avatar
siskue2005
70
Joined: 11 May 2007, 21:50

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Dragonfly wrote:
Fredy4 wrote:The more I look at that picture...

Are they even pipes or a flat surface witht the weave giving a 3D impression?

Look at it again, but with the fact its flat in your head.
Exactly. Look at it taking taking into account the whole arrangement of parts and components there.
It's the weave which gives the impression of (ribbed) pipes while the actual surface is concave.
Well the weave wont give you shadows on the sides
You can clearly see there are shadows on both sides, clearly indicating its a pipe

User avatar
Unc1e_M0nty
0
Joined: 14 Mar 2012, 15:49
Location: Wakefield

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Why a CF tube anyway, why not just use a rubber hose ?

Dragonfly
Dragonfly
23
Joined: 17 Mar 2008, 21:48
Location: Bulgaria

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Take a look at this picture and the shape of the nose cone stitching surface. It's self explanatory
Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Take into account the steering rack, upper wishbone and push rod.
On the other picture the multi-pin connector on the lower edge of the bulkhead is for the camera IMO.
Last edited by Dragonfly on 23 Mar 2012, 19:23, edited 1 time in total.
F1PitRadio ‏@F1PitRadio : MSC, "Sorry guys, there's not more in it"
Spa 2012

User avatar
siskue2005
70
Joined: 11 May 2007, 21:50

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

After having a close look
Image

The Red arrow is where the front wing comes into play, There should be a tube in front wing like the red colored dots which goes to the curved and long wing pylons.

Ingenious!

User avatar
siskue2005
70
Joined: 11 May 2007, 21:50

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Dragonfly wrote:Take a look at this picture and the shape of the nose cone stitching surface. It's self explanatory
Image
Take into account the steering rack, upper wishbone and push rod.
Sorry i didnt understand
On the other picture the multi-pin connector on the lower edge of the bulkhead is for the camera IMO.
Yup already coverd at page 80 i think.

Dragonfly
Dragonfly
23
Joined: 17 Mar 2008, 21:48
Location: Bulgaria

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

The connector is the least important thing. Look at the shape on the picture I posted and compare to what you see on the face up photo. Do you guys think seriously that two pipes almost with the diameter of the exhaust pipes run throughout the survival cell and at the front they not only transport air but are strong enough to act as suspension attachment point??
F1PitRadio ‏@F1PitRadio : MSC, "Sorry guys, there's not more in it"
Spa 2012

bosanac1
bosanac1
3
Joined: 25 Jan 2007, 01:08

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

does anyone think this seems way too complex just for small qualifying advantage and pretty useless/compromised for race?


.....couldn't this be all extra bulk support to strengthen the front wing so it can pass FIA tests, Mercedes like Ferrari tried really hard last season to get flexi wings like Red Bull

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Coefficient wrote:Well, I'm guessing that the flat carbon panel is removed when the nose is fitted then and is only in place when the team are working on the car with the nose off.
Seams odd that the top of the cover over the master cylinders has voids in it. It is not like they commonly work on anything is this area, A full cover would do a better job on hiding things. Maybe there is nothing to hide.

Brian

Dragonfly
Dragonfly
23
Joined: 17 Mar 2008, 21:48
Location: Bulgaria

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

:o Am I on everybody's ignore or the picture I posted is not visible to the rest?
It's clear as sunny day that the bulk is the attachment point of the front arm of the upper wishbone to the chassis.
F1PitRadio ‏@F1PitRadio : MSC, "Sorry guys, there's not more in it"
Spa 2012

User avatar
dren
227
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

hardingfv32 wrote:
Coefficient wrote:Well, I'm guessing that the flat carbon panel is removed when the nose is fitted then and is only in place when the team are working on the car with the nose off.
Seams odd that the top of the cover over the master cylinders has voids in it. It is not like they commonly work on anything is this area, A full cover would do a better job on hiding things. Maybe there is nothing to hide.

Brian
James Allen said it gives an advantage in qualifying of around 3 to 4 tenths. That is quite large.
Honda!

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

bosanac1 wrote:does anyone think this seems way too complex just for small qualifying advantage and pretty useless/compromised for race?
Agreed. And the performance of the car clearly indicates that it is not propelling then to the front. Maybe it is a distraction that their large engineering staff is not coping well with.

Brian

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

dren wrote:James Allen said it gives an advantage in qualifying of around 3 to 4 tenths. That is quite large.
If that is true then the W03 must be serious rubbish without such a system. It would imply that the rest of the car is just as bad as it was last year. Is that even possible?

Brian

User avatar
dren
227
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

hardingfv32 wrote:
dren wrote:James Allen said it gives an advantage in qualifying of around 3 to 4 tenths. That is quite large.
If that is true then the W03 must be serious rubbish without such a system. It would imply that the rest of the car is just as bad as it was last year. Is that even possible?

Brian
The advantage of the system is probably smaller on different tracks. James Allen said the Mercedes looks good at Malaysia. The car looks to be third best, and not too far off from the front. This is much better than last year. The best finish last year was a 4th place in the rain.
Honda!