And I would have said "sweet"thomin wrote:On a different note, had Mercedes asked me to chime in on the livery, here's what the W05 could have ended up with:
http://imageshack.com/a/img163/2889/5s5p.jpg
And I would have said "sweet"thomin wrote:On a different note, had Mercedes asked me to chime in on the livery, here's what the W05 could have ended up with:
http://imageshack.com/a/img163/2889/5s5p.jpg
Yes, but the nose used by Nico yesterday was painted.BorisTheBlade wrote:On the differently painted nose:
According to AmuS Eye witnesses are swearing that it had a big hole on top at Silverstone. Maybe this was photoshopped for the studio shots and what we are seeing at jerez is indeed just a nose test mule.
stefan_ wrote:I never say "I told you so" but...
https://twitter.com/stefan_f1/status/428110932414169088
They are definitely trying different things with the nose.
Meh... I think it's for the better that you didn't get to design itthomin wrote:On a different note, had Mercedes asked me to chime in on the livery, here's what the W05 could have ended up with:
http://imageshack.com/a/img163/2889/5s5p.jpg
Well, I guess tastes differ. Personally, I don't like the gradients at all, at least not on a Mercedes. I'd also like an all silver design of course, but since they went with black, I chose the logical conclusion.the user wrote:Meh... I think it's for the better that you didn't get to design itthomin wrote:On a different note, had Mercedes asked me to chime in on the livery, here's what the W05 could have ended up with:
http://imageshack.com/a/img163/2889/5s5p.jpgFor me personally it lacks sophistication and there's too much black. Sure, the original livery isn't exactly for my taste as well - why did they put black on it at all? It's a silver arrow. But the fading colors (black on the engine cover, ugly Petronas-green) help to add some elegance.
I think the No-holes rule denies you this solution, no matter if you add a vanity panel in some way..ferrari used a hole some years agothomin wrote:Since I was in the mood for photoshopping already, I also produced this:
http://imageshack.com/a/img268/3745/gub7.jpg
I wonder, would this be legal? this nose would have a single U-shaped tip, but then the Lotus solution behind it.
Yeah, makes sense. How does Red Bull get around this rule with their S-duct?diego.liv wrote:I think the No-holes rule denies you this solution, no matter if you add a vanity panel in some way..ferrari used a hole some years agothomin wrote:Since I was in the mood for photoshopping already, I also produced this:
http://imageshack.com/a/img268/3745/gub7.jpg
I wonder, would this be legal? this nose would have a single U-shaped tip, but then the Lotus solution behind it.
I noticed this too, but not post abut that. But it came into my mind if you can make the engine-gearbox point movable around the center axis? I don't say this is Merceds case, but just wondering if it would be legal.ForMuLaOne wrote:I get your point. As i look closer i believe that this is just a change in camber. the car itself seems to stay horizontal while the wheels are angled. Maybe they improved the suspension in a way that keeps the car aero stable but now also helps the tires in an innovative way.FoxHound wrote:In pictures 5 and 6 that forza kindly posted, you can clearly see the car leaning through the corners.
I have not seen this behaviour as pronounced as I have on the mercedes lineage starting with the W02.