Cool, thanks.aleks_ader wrote:I made nice research on that area in here http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... 66#p458366 on "Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula" topic.scuderiafan wrote:28.4 b) For the purposes of this Article 28.4 the power unit will be deemed to comprise six separate elements, the engine (ICE), the motor generator unit-kinetic (MGU-K), the motor generator unit-heat (MGU-H), the energy store (ES), turbocharger (TC) and control electronics (CE).Ganxxta wrote:About that... I checked their website and one of their "regular" products is this:
http://turbo.honeywell.com/our-technolo ... ochargers/
Is this possible with F1 rules or has a conventional design to be used?
If they used the same idea for their F1 Turbo and their numbers are more or less adoptable, this would be a big advantage compared to a conventional turbo design for F1 terms.
I'm surprised that they are sharing so many technical details, have fun:
http://turbo.honeywell.com/assets/pdfs/ ... tation.pdf
What do you guys think?
Says nothing about turbo design.
We discused in very construtive way. What are pros and cons, and talk about its legality (all aspect were discused, gear ratio, singlke/multiturbine, radial vs. axial etc.). Please read also carefully the rules and whole ongoing topic and make own conclusions.
Before also the user "Holm86" proposed that type of technology so you are no the first and last who ask this. So PLEASE read linked topic. Cheers!
I now read your linked post and will follow up with the others later on.
I avoided this thread because its now just way to big to find anything specific.