Bomber_Pilot wrote:So, it was 18kg a few days ago, now it's 13kg. At this rate their engine will be underweight by the time they get to Malaysia.
ROFL
Bomber_Pilot wrote:So, it was 18kg a few days ago, now it's 13kg. At this rate their engine will be underweight by the time they get to Malaysia.
brake by w. is not developed by the same company who use other teams? Brembo! why installation is so problematic????diffuser wrote:Kimi says brake by wire is the problem, NOT the F14t's plump figure. http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/form ... 4--f1.html
The difference is because KERS was twice less powerful, so the driver could sufficiently adjust braking action using his own brake biasing.alexx_88 wrote:What I don't get though, is how much different is this system compared to the years before when a similar mapping was employed because of the KERS.
Yeah, this year the entire system is controlled electronically and you'd probably have predefined braking maps which can be selected on the steering wheel. The problem is optimising these maps.timbo wrote:The difference is because KERS was twice less powerful, so the driver could sufficiently adjust braking action using his own brake biasing.alexx_88 wrote:What I don't get though, is how much different is this system compared to the years before when a similar mapping was employed because of the KERS.
The mgu-h doesn't slow the vehicle but it does have an effect on engine braking.alexx_88 wrote:Brembo probably supplies just the mechanical parts. The main difficulty this year is that, while the front braking is still done like on a normal car - driver presses pedal -> braking fluid pressure increases -> pads are pressed against the discs, the rear brakes are much different.
The brake pedal load cell is read by one of the ECUs on the car (possibly the Standard one) and determines how much brake force the driver wants to apply. Then, in theory, by using maps and some algorithms, the ECU splits this braking force across 2 components: the MGU-K generator and the actual rear brake cylinder. When and by how much these two contribute determines the mapping of the brake by wire system. Now, they probably were able to simulate and map the system pretty accurately before actually getting the car on the track, but, as you know, driver feeling is more important than rough numbers, so they probably just need to spend some more time adjusting the system to each driver's liking.
What I don't get though, is how much different is this system compared to the years before when a similar mapping was employed because of the KERS.
charlex wrote:brake by w. is not developed by the same company who use other teams? Brembo! why installation is so problematic????diffuser wrote:Kimi says brake by wire is the problem, NOT the F14t's plump figure. http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/form ... 4--f1.html
here is the photo that I had already 'posted, I tried to improve it with phoshop but it is always poor definitionf300v10 wrote:Tobias Grüner of AMUS is reporting that the Ferrari PU turbo layout is similar to that of Mercedes. Turbine at the rear, MGU-H in the middle of the V, compressor at the front. Wonder how long it will be before we see actual photos of the three power units.