Power=economy?

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
Arterius
Arterius
3
Joined: 08 Jul 2010, 10:55
Location: Pretoria, South Africa

Re: Power=economy?

Post

The fuel flow limit is there to limit the maximum power that they can produce. If this wasn't in place the teams could run the engines under massive power in qualifying, setting very fast times, and then would be a lot slower in the race. The flow limit aims to bring the race power and qualifying power closer together, whilst still allowing a bit of extra power when needed to aid in overtaking.

User avatar
mertol
7
Joined: 19 Mar 2013, 10:02

Re: Power=economy?

Post

This graphic seems to confirm it - mercedes engines have the lowest consumption:
Image

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Power=economy?

Post

mertol wrote:This graphic seems to confirm it - mercedes engines have the lowest consumption:
http://i.imgur.com/STAyVnU.jpg
This year the fuel consumption depends largely on how much time you spend at max fuel-flow, 10.5 to 14 kRpm,
why it can also be that the W05 is a superior car in other areas so that the drivers don't need to rev that much.

It can also be that Nico Hulkenberg is an underrated driver, who can be easy on the throttle and still very fast.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

User avatar
mertol
7
Joined: 19 Mar 2013, 10:02

Re: Power=economy?

Post

Yes but Massa also has low usage.

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Power=economy?

Post

mertol wrote:Yes but Massa also has low usage.
No surprise there, both Massa and Kobayashi were slow in the race... :lol:

But seriously, it's an indication, but that can also be from the Mercedes ERS-systems being more efficient, saving fuel.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

wuzak
wuzak
470
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: Power=economy?

Post

xpensive wrote:
mertol wrote:Yes but Massa also has low usage.
No surprise there, both Massa and Kobayashi were slow in the race... :lol:

But seriously, it's an indication, but that can also be from the Mercedes ERS-systems being more efficient, saving fuel.
Or it could just mean that they have a superior ERS strategy.

iHpled
iHpled
0
Joined: 24 Dec 2013, 18:08
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Power=economy?

Post

mertol wrote:This graphic seems to confirm it - mercedes engines have the lowest consumption:
http://i.imgur.com/STAyVnU.jpg
This graphic says nothing... we don't know with how much fuel everybody started etc..

NoDivergence
NoDivergence
50
Joined: 02 Feb 2011, 01:52

Re: Power=economy?

Post

iHpled wrote:
mertol wrote:This graphic seems to confirm it - mercedes engines have the lowest consumption:
http://i.imgur.com/STAyVnU.jpg
This graphic says nothing... we don't know with how much fuel everybody started etc..
It means plenty. The % is out of 100 kg allowable.

User avatar
mertol
7
Joined: 19 Mar 2013, 10:02

Re: Power=economy?

Post

4 out the top 5 lowest consumptions are mercedes' engines looks like a pattern to me. You wouldn't suggest all of them started with extra fuel on board?