Team: Adrian Newey (CTO), Rob Marshall (CD), Peter Prodromou (HA), Christian Horner (TP)
Drivers: Sebastian Vettel (1), Daniel Ricciardo (3), Sébastian Buemi (Reserve), António Félix Da Costa (Reserve)
Team name: Infiniti Red Bull Racing
Dude ... are you realy going to post the same image on each topic ?jagunx51 wrote:some comparison :Blackout wrote:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkSuwjRIAAAz_Mb.jpg:large
http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... 55#p501655
Teams try some weird set ups in FP though, aero rakes, nose pods and such. Makes sense to me though that teams will use the FIA rig during the initial build and set up.dans79 wrote:I thought you had to pass to pass to take part in FP?bill shoe wrote:FYI I think there is no official scrutineering until later in the weekend. However, teams are free to put their cars on the FIA rig to check dimensions, compliances, etc. against the relevant measurement rig.
same images .... but different point of view..... afaik, the mr03's pic is new .....i'm trying to compare 3 different engines, so posting it on each topic should has correlation, the merc & ferrari & renault fans might have their own thought .....if this annoying you, than I am sorryblokkie wrote:Dude ... are you realy going to post the same image on each topic ?jagunx51 wrote:some comparison :Blackout wrote:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkSuwjRIAAAz_Mb.jpg:large
http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... 55#p501655
That's now the 3the time I see this on a diff topic.
I'm not a mod, it's not for me to judge, but the general statement is: if it's not in the car it doesn't belong in this thread. Merc & ferrari are not on this car so... your idea belongs in the car comparison thread.jagunx51 wrote:
same images .... but different point of view..... afaik, the mr03's pic is new .....i'm trying to compare 3 different engines, so posting it on each topic should has correlation, the merc & ferrari & renault fans might have their own thought .....if this annoying you, than I am sorry
This is not a legal nose solution. it's too high and doesn't the surface area regs.dans79 wrote:That almost looks to high to be legal, and the crash structures looks to thin as well.markn93 wrote:What's going on here? - http://img3.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Red ... 769415.jpg
And is that a much higher nose than before? Also camera no longer under Casio sticker?
Height is difficult to assess without a front wing and mounted at an angle on the trolley, however it almost definitely meets surface area regs.Coefficient wrote:This is not a legal nose solution. it's too high and doesn't the surface area regs.dans79 wrote:That almost looks to high to be legal, and the crash structures looks to thin as well.markn93 wrote:What's going on here? - http://img3.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Red ... 769415.jpg
And is that a much higher nose than before? Also camera no longer under Casio sticker?
+1 .. so funnybgroovers wrote:Really guys? This is F1 tech website.....
That car has not been fitted with its lower crash structure/nose and the wing. The "black box" sits under and in front of the yellow cone.
Next you'll be wondering why the wheels arent touching the ground and if the black box on the top of the tub are latest upgrades.
Cant believe that 4 of you have posted and re posted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Without the front wing, there is no downforce to keep the wheels on the ground. duh...bgroovers wrote: Next you'll be wondering why the wheels arent touching the ground and if the black box on the top of the tub are latest upgrades.
