Mercedes-AMG F1 W10 EQ Power+

[dans79]

https://twitter.com/NicolasF1i/status/1 ... 02306?s=19

That would explain why it came off during the race. Hamilton had an off track excursion over the weekend didn't he?

[NathanOlder]

https://twitter.com/NicolasF1i/status/1 ... 02306?s=19

That would explain why it came off during the race. Hamilton had an off track excursion over the weekend didn't he?

I cant remember him doing so, can only remember Bottas having a couple of moments.
I'm probably wrong though

[GrizzleBoy]

Ham ran over the kerb at T1 on his first run of Q3 that lost him 5 tenths in sector 1.

Possible that the shock damaged the thin metal mounting arm.of that part of the floor and they needed to repair it.

[zibby43]

https://twitter.com/LuisFeF1/status/110 ... 54880:orig

[M840TR]

via Albert Fabrega

[OO7]

EDIT:
The red arrow item wasn't new for Australia, it was run in the second preseason test but wasn't initially fitted to the car.

[foxmulder_ms]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2Bs0qSX0AIrxb-.jpg:large

via Albert Fabrega

This is a great picture. Reminds me Su-27.

[M840TR]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2Bs0qSX0AIrxb-.jpg:large

via Albert Fabrega

This is a great picture. Reminds me Su-27.

Well it can certainly make flanking maneuvers.

[Morteza]

Interesting details under the Mercedes AMG F1 W10 front wing: strakes not really parallel, and 'mini-cape' at the connection between neutral section and flap

[elMaestro]

https://www.facebook.com/79511407410/po ... 224447411/ the amount of damage Lewis's car had.

[Just_a_fan]

Interesting details under the Mercedes AMG F1 W10 front wing: strakes not really parallel, and 'mini-cape' at the connection between neutral section and flap

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2Bf27KW0AAymEl.jpg:large

Not sure what they mean by "mini-cape" at the connection.

[zibby43]

Interesting details under the Mercedes AMG F1 W10 front wing: strakes not really parallel, and 'mini-cape' at the connection between neutral section and flap

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2Bf27KW0AAymEl.jpg:large

Not sure what they mean by "mini-cape" at the connection.

Had the exact same question, myself.

[bill shoe]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2Bf27KW0AAymEl.jpg:large

Not sure what they mean by "mini-cape" at the connection.

Had the exact same question, myself.

The neutral section extends slightly further outboard than it needs to, so it partially extends under the non-neutral section. As highlighted by white arrow.

[zibby43]

Not sure what they mean by "mini-cape" at the connection.

Had the exact same question, myself.

The neutral section extends slightly further outboard than it needs to, so it partially extends under the non-neutral section. As highlighted by white arrow.

Very concise and accurate description. Can see exactly what you're referring to now. Thank you.

[Just_a_fan]

Not sure what they mean by "mini-cape" at the connection.

Had the exact same question, myself.

The neutral section extends slightly further outboard than it needs to, so it partially extends under the non-neutral section. As highlighted by white arrow.

I don't think it does, to be honest. From these two views, it looks like the end of the neutral section is fairly vertical, not projecting out like the cape. It makes no sense to extend the bottom face of the neutral section - you want the air to flow around the edge because that's what creates the Y250 vortex. Extending a cape out from the lower edge doesn't seem to do much.




We need a better, closer, view of the area.