No.
If that's true that they are keeping DRS while coming up with regulations that allow better following they are indeed mental...We will get even more boring "overtakes" on the straights where a driver only pushes a button. What's the whole point of making cars easier to follow then?!
3.10 Rear Wing
It has been confirmed pal. Honestly there's more brains on the Rippers hammer. Why the hell will drivers attempt a risky overtake when they will be able to follow closer right before the DRS line......TheRacingElf wrote: ↑31 Oct 2019, 19:16If that's true that they are keeping DRS while coming up with regulations that allow better following they are indeed mental...We will get even more boring "overtakes" on the straights where a driver only pushes a button. What's the whole point of making cars easier to follow then?!
Great info. Looks promising, doesn't look too restrictive at a first glance.RZS10 wrote: ↑31 Oct 2019, 19:17https://i.imgur.com/lkZsMRP.png
https://i.imgur.com/gSz6pXO.png
https://i.imgur.com/6et3Uzg.png
https://i.imgur.com/42ejvXU.gif
https://i.imgur.com/30mDgBK.gif
last one shows which parts will/might be spec
Adding fuel flow WILL NOT increase rpm, especially with more distance per PU required because of more race weekends. These are already the most powerful race day engines in F1 history, there is absolutely no reason to increase fuel flow.Holm86 wrote: ↑31 Oct 2019, 19:08I'm still hugely disappointed that they didn't do anything on the engine side. I'm fine with keeping they current layout, but at least up the fuel flow and rpm a bit.
It annoys me when Ross Brawn is being so hypocritical, saying they need to think of the environment, when the engines in F1 are already best in class when it comes to TBE, and the cars are the least polluting thing of the F1 circus
DRS zones are(already) adjustable in length, all the way down to 0m. There is no reason to take it off the car, especially if you might need it since the tires are still pirelli garbage.