Ferrari SF1000

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Post Reply
f1316
78
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

So that’s definitely a different radiator layout - see https://ibb.co/pR2xv2h for the old one.

User avatar
MtthsMlw
1033
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

f1316 wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:46
So that’s definitely a different radiator layout - see https://ibb.co/pR2xv2h for the old one.
That's the SF90 though :?

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Scarbs take on what the issues are.

197 104 103 7

f1316
78
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

MtthsMlw wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:48
f1316 wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:46
So that’s definitely a different radiator layout - see https://ibb.co/pR2xv2h for the old one.
That's the SF90 though :?
Hmmm is it? I took it from this article https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-fe ... n=widget-1

Not saying you’re wrong - I just couldn’t tell - and seemed odd the article would use a picture of the old car.

User avatar
MtthsMlw
1033
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

f1316 wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:55
MtthsMlw wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:48
f1316 wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:46


So that’s definitely a different radiator layout - see https://ibb.co/pR2xv2h for the old one.
That's the SF90 though :?
Hmmm is it? I took it from this article https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-fe ... n=widget-1

Not saying you’re wrong - I just couldn’t tell - and seemed odd the article would use a picture of the old car.
Guess they didn't had a proper one of the SF1000. See the sidepod deflector on the left.

MakkieT
0
Joined: 07 Feb 2015, 21:47

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

That's exactly why it's the sf1000. The sf90 has a connected deflector.

keroro.90
1
Joined: 01 Jul 2013, 21:32

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

dans79 wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:51
Scarbs take on what the issues are.

Hopefully, this is the situation. If they really lack 70 (or more) HP from the PU is gonna be a disaster for the entire season (and for the next one).

f1316
78
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

MtthsMlw wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:58
f1316 wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:55
MtthsMlw wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:48


That's the SF90 though :?
Hmmm is it? I took it from this article https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-fe ... n=widget-1

Not saying you’re wrong - I just couldn’t tell - and seemed odd the article would use a picture of the old car.
Guess they didn't had a proper one of the SF1000. See the sidepod deflector on the left.
Yes, you’re right - I see the all red paint/Lenovo. Do we know what the radiators looked like before?

User avatar
MtthsMlw
1033
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

f1316 wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 21:25
MtthsMlw wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:58
f1316 wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:55


Hmmm is it? I took it from this article https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-fe ... n=widget-1

Not saying you’re wrong - I just couldn’t tell - and seemed odd the article would use a picture of the old car.
Guess they didn't had a proper one of the SF1000. See the sidepod deflector on the left.
Yes, you’re right - I see the all red paint/Lenovo. Do we know what the radiators looked like before?
Not really just here. If there is truth to the radiator drag story we'll see them placing some on top of the engine together with a different airbox - something along the lines what Alfa has I imagine. This isn't the case yet.

Fer.Fan
0
Joined: 02 Mar 2015, 21:31

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

MtthsMlw wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 21:38
f1316 wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 21:25
MtthsMlw wrote:
16 Jul 2020, 16:58


Guess they didn't had a proper one of the SF1000. See the sidepod deflector on the left.
Yes, you’re right - I see the all red paint/Lenovo. Do we know what the radiators looked like before?
Not really just here. If there is truth to the radiator drag story we'll see them placing some on top of the engine together with a different airbox - something along the lines what Alfa has I imagine. This isn't the case yet.
This what is has been done on the cooling and gearbox area from 2019 to 2020;

The cooling system represented one of the toughest challenges for the Italians’ engineers as it had already been extreme enough before. However, to further enhance the aerodynamic efficiency of the car, every part of the cooling system had to be designed to be even tighter while some cooling elements have been lowered to further lower the car’s centre of gravity.

While Ferrari’s previous car, the SF90 was based around a low-drag concept, priority has been given to the aerodynamic downforce of the car. The rear bodywork on the Ferrari SF1000 is more tight-fitting than on the 2019 car, thanks to the work carried out on optimising the shape and layout of the components under the engine cover. The gearbox casing has been reduced in size to allow for this more extreme bodywork shape”

warpomex
3
Joined: 13 May 2018, 05:15

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

No new nose for Hungary?

Marble
23
Joined: 11 Mar 2017, 22:30

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Anyway we could differentiate the HP deficit from the drag deficit using speed traces ?
Maybe comparing race traces with DRS and without DRS ?

User avatar
MtthsMlw
1033
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Old FW but new floor used today.
Image

User avatar
JordanMugen
82
Joined: 17 Oct 2018, 13:36

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

outsid3r wrote:
14 Jul 2020, 11:32
the gearbox made slimmer for this year to help aerodynamics but resulted in it not being rigid enough and messing with rear suspension settings
What a mess!

Reliability and mechanical durability has to come first surely, even in F1? Cars that place aerodynamics first like the MP4/18 seem to result in all kinds of disaster.

zioture
496
Joined: 12 Feb 2013, 12:46
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Ferrari SF1000

Post

Radiators and Power unit comparison

Image

Image

Post Reply