I see what you're talking about. If only I could peek ahead a few years and see if what you're saying pans out.MIKEY_! wrote:They are just drawing air from above the sidepod rather than from the splitter. That air will be just as clean I think. The downside is that it creates lift at the sidepod and possibly air won't flow between the rear wheels as well as it did causing more drag. Actually this design makes having a high nose less important, maybe an advantage when the new rules arrive.
Yes - and it's confusing the f*ck out of meCrucial_Xtreme wrote:The tunnels on the RB8 are gone. Coincidence they're faster/more competitive? I don't believe so.
and so does Merc carsRB7ate9 wrote:From Vettel's results with the tight coke bottle in China (considering he is no slouch), there needs to be an additional aspect to gain back downforce and speed.
What is peculiar is that Lotus, who has a similarly tight coke bottle, has been doing well without the same coanda exhausts used in Sauber and Maclaren. Grosjean and Raikkonen have been doing very well .
Maybe you just didn't feel like studying it?raymondu999 wrote:Yes - and it's confusing the f*ck out of meCrucial_Xtreme wrote:The tunnels on the RB8 are gone. Coincidence they're faster/more competitive? I don't believe so.![]()
But I guess that's why I'm not in engineering. Any takers as to why?
I meant why the tunnels disappearing made them faster.Owen.C93 wrote:Maybe you just didn't feel like studying it?raymondu999 wrote:Yes - and it's confusing the f*ck out of meCrucial_Xtreme wrote:The tunnels on the RB8 are gone. Coincidence they're faster/more competitive? I don't believe so.![]()
But I guess that's why I'm not in engineering. Any takers as to why?
Because the tunnels were introducing flow across the exhaust towards the inside of the car while the coanda effect pulled the exhaust down, this introduced a nice big swirly mess of a hurricane in front of the rear axle and wasn't efficient at all.raymondu999 wrote:I meant why the tunnels disappearing made them faster.Owen.C93 wrote:Maybe you just didn't feel like studying it?raymondu999 wrote: Yes - and it's confusing the f*ck out of me![]()
But I guess that's why I'm not in engineering. Any takers as to why?
Yeah I'm pretty much with Owen on this one. I think the flows; exhaust, lateral flow & flow over sidepods were causing problems in the way Newey had them coming together. The new way is more straight forward and probably easier to manage.raymondu999 wrote: I meant why the tunnels disappearing made them faster.