They have had flow-vis on that wishbone the other day as well though.

Adrian Newby wrote:And an "air dam" is the last thing he would want in that already narrowed area between the front tires (an air dam, and the air being redirected by it, wouldn't just go upward, but also outward).
For the air dam theory, the fences would be what stops the air also pushing outwards....Adrian Newby wrote:I have also noticed that none of the teams have created humps which are rounded on the sides, even though that would create less drag. This is more proof to me that they want as little air as possible pushing out from the top. Newey even built fences on either side of his ramp/intake to keep it from happening.
Don't those four holes lead into the cockpit?Intego wrote:deleted
I believe they're the mounting points for the front wing and nosecone assembly unless I'm mistaken?Adrian Newby wrote:Don't those four holes lead into the cockpit?Intego wrote:deleted
You don't want air splurging off the sides. And if the air dam didn't extend forward of the ramp area then what's the point of it?avatar wrote:Adrian Newby wrote:And an "air dam" is the last thing he would want in that already narrowed area between the front tires (an air dam, and the air being redirected by it, wouldn't just go upward, but also outward).For the air dam theory, the fences would be what stops the air also pushing outwards....Adrian Newby wrote:I have also noticed that none of the teams have created humps which are rounded on the sides, even though that would create less drag. This is more proof to me that they want as little air as possible pushing out from the top. Newey even built fences on either side of his ramp/intake to keep it from happening.
If they're just using the slot to bleed off air pressure at the hump, hen it would be simpler to splurge it off to the sides, which is why were all interested in it.
My guess is it's either
- an air dam creating a virtual smooth nose
- reducing he work done/ turbulence at the windscreen/drivers head buy cutting out the the laminar flow (I think that's the right term) from the nose before the hump( but what do you do with that air?)
- the air is being useful routed e.g. as someone suggested to create positive pressure in the cockpit.
edit: looking at the naked bulkhead, the air can only go down if anywhere....?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but those holes are to hold the nose itself. I deleted my post because it must be a last years picture. I'm searching for proof.Adrian Newby wrote:Don't those four holes lead into the cockpit?Intego wrote:deleted
This appears to be a different chassis than the hump/intake models. Where is the upper radius for the intake? That part looks to be built into the chassis.Lorenzo_Bandini wrote:
Good catch on the stripes. I am guessing the lower intake we see there is much the same this year as last.bhallg2k wrote:Those hole are to attach the nose, and that picture of the exposed bulkhead is from last year. Check the color order of the stripes on the side.
I don't know enough about suspension design to comment on your thoughts technically, but I applaud your effort at creating a drawing even without the use of MSPaint! =D>Shafto wrote: ...........................|------|
...........................| \/.\/ |
=======_===|.........|
...................\_....| \/..\/ |
.....................\_..|.........|
.........................\| \/..\/ |
...........................|........|
...........................|____|
= main support
-\ lower support
| \/\/ | tire
......... nevermind