F1MATHS: Sector data reveals a fragmented competitive order

The best‑sector times from the 2026 Miami Grand Prix Sprint Qualifying paint a far more complex picture than the final classification suggested. F1Technical's senior writer Balazs Szabo delivers his analaysis.
While the session ultimately rewarded drivers who stitched together clean laps on a rapidly evolving surface, the underlying sector data shows that the competitive order varied across the three segments of the Miami International Autodrome. No single driver topped more than one sector, and the gaps fluctuated from mere thousandths to well over a second depending on the part of the lap.
Sector 1: Leclerc and Norris set the benchmarkThe opening sector, dominated by medium‑speed direction changes and a rhythm‑based sequence of corners, belonged unequivocally to Charles Leclerc. His precision through Turns 1–4 gave Ferrari the strongest start to the lap.
Lando Norris was closest, only 0.008s adrift, underlining McLaren’s agility in the initial phase. Behind them, the gaps opened quickly: Lewis Hamilton was 0.062s back, Oscar Piastri 0.077s, and Kimi Antonelli already 0.285s off the benchmark.
The field then stretched dramatically. Max Verstappen lost 0.532s, George Russell 0.560s, and the midfield spread ballooned beyond seven‑tenths.
By the time the list reached Valtteri Bottas, the slowest in Sector 1, the deficit had grown to 1.867s. The sector exposed which cars struggled most with initial rotation and front‑end bite—an area where Red Bull and Aston Martin were notably off the pace.
Sector 2: Antonelli Dominates the Technical Middle SectorThe tight, technical middle sector—defined by the chicane and the long, traction‑limited acceleration zones—was where Kimi Antonelli delivered a standout performance. His purple sector time confimred Mercedes’ strength in mechanical grip and low‑speed stability.
Norris again featured near the top, only 0.024s behind, while Russell’s 0.132s deficit placed both Mercedes cars inside the top three. Leclerc followed at 0.147s, with Piastri at 0.181s and Verstappen at 0.196s.
Hamilton, however, dropped to 0.424s, suggesting setup divergence within Mercedes. The midfield remained tightly packed through the first half of the order, but the gaps widened sharply toward the back. Fernando Alonso was the slowest in this sector at 1.447s, with Bottas at 1.392s and Sergio Pérez at 1.180s, indicating significant struggles for Sauber, Aston Martin, and Red Bull in the slowest part of the lap.
Sector 3: Russell Leads the High‑Speed FinaleThe final sector, dominated by long straights and high‑speed commitment, was where George Russell delivered the fastest time. His Mercedes was particularly strong in straight‑line efficiency and late‑braking stability.
Verstappen was closest at 0.012s, showing that Red Bull’s top‑speed package remained competitive even if the rest of the lap was inconsistent. Antonelli again impressed with 0.085s, completing a session in which he topped one sector and ranked inside the top three in another.
Piastri (0.110s) and Norris (0.116s) kept McLaren firmly in the mix, while Leclerc’s 0.126s placed Ferrari slightly behind in the final portion of the lap. Hamilton’s 0.191s deficit reflected a solid but not exceptional performance.
The midfield gaps were more compressed here than in Sector 1, but the tail end still drifted beyond half a second. Bottas lost 0.846s, and Alonso again closed the list at 0.933s, confirming Aston Martin’s lack of efficiency in the high‑speed sections.



