I believe it is limited to surfaces 'in contact with the external air stream'. In this case the duct would be involved.skgoa wrote:Isn't there a senctence about "closed surface" as well?
Brian
I believe it is limited to surfaces 'in contact with the external air stream'. In this case the duct would be involved.skgoa wrote:Isn't there a senctence about "closed surface" as well?
Lol i just love the way people dismiss Scrabs because their arm chair is better than scrab's personal contacts in the f1 paddockhardingfv32 wrote:If it is creating an imbalance during Qual then just close the DRS flap. How may corners benefit from a low drag setup? During the races it is not an issue and stalling the main wing would be a benefit.Raptor22 wrote:Let me understand this:The armchair aero guys are saying its more beneficial to stall a DRS activated wing, thereby shedding more downforce and creating a bigger front rear aero imbalance....?
Scrabs proposal is now off the table.
Brian
you wont be able to 'see' the stallingskgoa wrote:The camera just followed Schumacher for one lap:
- The front wing is flexing and is NOT being stalled.
- Schumacher is FAST.
- The W03 seems to handle very well for both drivers.
Edit after lap onboard Rosberg's car:
- Front wing still flexing, not stalling.
- He is fast, too. But Anthony Davidson said the car looked lighter than the Red Bulls did.
- He complained about understeer just now.
I am just quoting this for posterity. I don't think I need to make any more arguments.siskue2005 wrote:you wont be able to 'see' the stallingskgoa wrote:The camera just followed Schumacher for one lap:
- The front wing is flexing and is NOT being stalled.
- Schumacher is FAST.
- The W03 seems to handle very well for both drivers.
Edit after lap onboard Rosberg's car:
- Front wing still flexing, not stalling.
- He is fast, too. But Anthony Davidson said the car looked lighter than the Red Bulls did.
- He complained about understeer just now.
just like we were not able to 'see' the f-duct stalling the rear wing