I am not sure, what to do about them. The goal is always to have rules that we can easily check. And I am not sure how this would be done with these parts. Suggestions are welcome.
I am not sure, what to do about them. The goal is always to have rules that we can easily check. And I am not sure how this would be done with these parts. Suggestions are welcome.
Just add some new legality boxes near the wheels? I could suggest some boxes with the wheels I use if you like? These parts would be wheel fixed reference rather than car fixed - I'm not sure how that would work with the rake settings?
Just try both out, maybe give them a distinct name, so I can feed back which worked. I assume, (packed) the files are pretty small, so yes, you can send them through email.MaccaRacing wrote: ↑11 Apr 2021, 11:03RW regulation box done! Solidworks tells me that I can export it to STEP AP203 and AP214 formats.. which one is the right one? then can I send you the file by email?
Fronts are 270mm tread/~350mm section width, rears are 405mm tread/~455mm section, tyres are 725mm diameter. Front suspension arms could/should be inclined so they are nose down because of the front wing wake, rules say up to 10deg nose down. Personally I never bother with tyre squish unless I know the actual geometry of the tyre - it's inaccurate regardless.CAEdevice wrote: ↑11 Apr 2021, 13:09Hi, here is the first attempt to model a 2022 wheel.
https://www.caedevice.net/SERVER/MVRC/2 ... 210411.jpg
Consider that in our simulations wheels are not "static" and the effects of downforce deform the rubber and make it a bit different from an almost perfect cylinder.
The modeling of the deformation is not accurate (it will never be very accurate, but in this case it is a pure guess).
I have doubts about the tyre width: I was convinced that front tyres in 2022 should be narrower than in 2021, but from the official rules it looks like they preserved about the same width (can anyone confirm that?).
On the contrary the diameter increased a bit.
I also have doubts about the orientation of the suspensions arms section: F1 rules allow a small angle of incidence, but each teams uses different angles. What about our cars? Neutral profile? Small positive incidence?
A little bit is ok and actually very good as a completely round tire would be a bit unrealistic, but the CFD domain should define the plane that cuts the wheel off.
For the official simulations a pre-defined template in MFlow is used. To develop your car you are welcome to use what ever settings you like. You should just make sure that the results of your own simulations correlate well with the official ones.