Tomato or brown sauce?Diesel wrote:Sure.
JET forgot to properly sauce his post, always remember peeps, sauce your post....

Thanks for the sources guys.
Bit of a howler by Ferrari. Certainly won't improve the mood in Maranello.
Tomato or brown sauce?Diesel wrote:Sure.
JET forgot to properly sauce his post, always remember peeps, sauce your post....
Charlie Whiting has stated that it is a clever interpretation of the rule, and he will discuss with Ferrari. No doubt thatt if it is found to be an advantage, it will be disallowed. That would be normal for FIA.Diesel wrote:From what I understand the appearance of this 'gurney' is something to do with a loophole in the rule defining a minimum distance between slot gap separators... Although, that might have been completely scrambled by the media. Hopefully Scarbs will produce a drawing explaining all =]
It is an aspirator I highly assume, as demonstrated by Hammond f.e. here from 04:50 onwards, getting more air through the exhaust, and as a side-effect more airflow through the side-pod/radiator(?).n smikle wrote:This is either an ejector, or a shockwave suppressor, even a silencer!
Francesc wrote:
As I read the rule, Ferrari is claiming that this is not a gurney, it is not a flap, but it is a support for their movable flap. It seems to fit the description laid down in the rules, but doesn't seem to do much supporting.n_anirudh wrote:
Also notice the new profile on the beam wing
P34 wrote:It is an aspirator I highly assume, as demonstrated by Hammond f.e. here from 04:50 onwards, getting more air through the exhaust, and as a side-effect more airflow through the side-pod/radiator(?).n smikle wrote:This is either an ejector, or a shockwave suppressor, even a silencer!
Francesc wrote:
Scarbs says he thought they could run it but that andrew bensons says they can't.Mchamilton wrote:scarbs says ferrari have been told they cant run it