jason.parker.86 wrote:1st - How can we blame Brawn for sending out a car which they knew thought wasnt performing as it should be? If this is the case, then 9/10 cars wouldnt be on the track because they would be deemed a danger.
Because, if I'm not mistaken, Barichello stated that something was wring in the rear of the car and it felt like it was too soft or something like that. If that's the case, they should have pulled the car in and went over the rear of the car and checked and rechecked everything to make sure nothing was loose. Obviously something was. If a spring worked it's way out it's obviously dangerous and they shouldn't have gone back out. Simple check really. In their defense, they could have done those checks and found nothing, it simply failed under load. Which they couldn't cehck in the pits. Now, if they scrutinize the car and find an obvious failure, like they can see some serious structural failure, they should be sat out until they can demonstrate it won't happen again. That's just my opinion based off Rubens saying they knew something was amiss in the rear suspension.